<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asking the right questions of open source</title>
	<link>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source</link>
	<description>IBM RPG and Databases</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arjen Lentz</title>
		<link>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjen Lentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t think success is necessarily measured in “revenue crosses $1bln”. It’s certainly one way of looking at business, and probably the most common used in recent times. But, is it the best in all situations? Can all markets be analysed in the same way?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think success is necessarily measured in “revenue crosses $1bln”. It’s certainly one way of looking at business, and probably the most common used in recent times. But, is it the best in all situations? Can all markets be analysed in the same way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-24</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Matthew,
It’s always interesting to see the difference between what gets told to a reporter and what actually gets written.     I helped prep Kim for this briefing, and your main point (that a key success factor is having compelling value above-and-beyond the free version of their product) was a big part thereof.  In short, many commercial OSS ISVs struggle with this, but those who do this right become very successful. They get the benefit of broad adoption of the free product, leading to great upsell opportunity of the for-fee offerings - basically “having ones cake and eating it too”.  And that for-fee offering is hardly ever just support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My sense is Aaron (the reporter) uncovered a lot of issues during his interviews, and with a very tight deadline (Kim got interviewed just a couple hours before his deadline), this is the best he could do with limited time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matthew,<br />
It’s always interesting to see the difference between what gets told to a reporter and what actually gets written.     I helped prep Kim for this briefing, and your main point (that a key success factor is having compelling value above-and-beyond the free version of their product) was a big part thereof.  In short, many commercial OSS ISVs struggle with this, but those who do this right become very successful. They get the benefit of broad adoption of the free product, leading to great upsell opportunity of the for-fee offerings - basically “having ones cake and eating it too”.  And that for-fee offering is hardly ever just support.</p>
<p>My sense is Aaron (the reporter) uncovered a lot of issues during his interviews, and with a very tight deadline (Kim got interviewed just a couple hours before his deadline), this is the best he could do with limited time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Aslett</title>
		<link>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Aslett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, not looking to criticize the reporter but it does seem to be trying to squeeze too many ideas into a small space. Each of the questions it raises reserves more attention&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, not looking to criticize the reporter but it does seem to be trying to squeeze too many ideas into a small space. Each of the questions it raises reserves more attention</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asking the right questions of open source &#124; OSS Spyglass</title>
		<link>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Asking the right questions of open source &#124; OSS Spyglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 451 CAOS Theory » Asking the right questions of open source       Uncategorized [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 451 CAOS Theory » Asking the right questions of open source       Uncategorized [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory » Commercial licensing is a double-edged sword</title>
		<link>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory » Commercial licensing is a double-edged sword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-21</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] source vendors. But maybe not. Consider the recent discussion on open source business models. I wrote yesterday that “most open source vendors have some kind of ‘unique, must-have technology' [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] source vendors. But maybe not. Consider the recent discussion on open source business models. I wrote yesterday that “most open source vendors have some kind of ‘unique, must-have technology&#8217; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irregular Enterprise mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Irregular Enterprise mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] source vendors. But maybe not. Consider the recent discussion on open source business models. I wrote yesterday that "most open source vendors have some kind of ‘unique, must-have technology' [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] source vendors. But maybe not. Consider the recent discussion on open source business models. I wrote yesterday that &#8220;most open source vendors have some kind of ‘unique, must-have technology&#8217; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory » Open source is dead, long live open source</title>
		<link>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory » Open source is dead, long live open source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.86db1.com/asking-the-right-questions-of-open-source#comment-19</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] also: Commercial licensing is a double-edged sword Asking the right questions of open source Open source: assimilate and thrive Judging open source business models  Permalink &#124;  Technorati [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] also: Commercial licensing is a double-edged sword Asking the right questions of open source Open source: assimilate and thrive Judging open source business models  Permalink |  Technorati [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
